Cf. Lee et al 2001 e Kim & Lee
2012.
Experimental Blog of the research group titled "Institutions, political behavior and new digital technologies" (Geist) coordinated by Professor Sérgio Braga of the Department of Social Science/ UFPR. The group seeks to investigate the use of the internet by different actors from the point of view of political scientist, not that one of the social philosopher, information manager, sociologist of communication nor computer expert's.
31 de jan. de 2013
Periódico: Public Administration Review
27 de jan. de 2013
Estatísticas sobre internet pelo google
11 de jan. de 2013
BIB: ICT, Public Administration and Democracy in the Coming Decade
Dear colleague,
I am delighted to announce the new issue (17:3-4) of Information Polity, focusing on ICT, Public
Administration and Democracy in the Coming Decade and edited by Albert
Meijer, Frank Bannister and Marcel Thaens.
On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the
permanent study group on e-government of the European Group for Public Administration, we decided to
take the risk and edit a volume on ‘ICT and Public Administration and
Democracy in the Coming Decade’.
The 20th anniversary had already been used to
look back at the work of this study group and this resulted in a rich special
issue of Information Polity .We felt that we should now, as a
counterweight to these backward looking reflections, look forward. This
collection of papers celebrates the fact that research into e-governance is
alive and well and presents cutting edge knowledge for academics and
policy-makers.
Introduction
ICT, Public Administration and Democracy in the Coming Decade A. Meijer, F. Bannister, M. Thaens
Section One: the past and the
present situation as starting point for thinking about the future.
What lessons for the future can be learned if we look at the practice (Bannister and Connolly) and the visions (Taylor) of eGovernment in the past? Lessons can also be learned from complexities associated with eGovernment (Lips). Knowing what we know now, how can we deal with these complexities?
Forward
to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far
F. Bannister, R. Connolly
Surveillance
as X-ray
C.W.R. Webster
Section two: the future
implications of eGovernment for Government Institutions.
This section then covers topics that are relevant for thinking about the way government works and functions. One of these topics is the added value of interorganizational information sharing and integration (Gil-Garcia). But also discussions about a new concept like 'Publicness' of information (Mergel) or a more classic theme like Transparency (Grimmelikhuijsen) seem to fit very well within this section. Also the future of participatory democracy and the idea of a do-it-yourself state are described (Meijer).
Towards a
smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond
J.R. Gil-Garcia
A good
man but a bad wizard. About the limits and future of transparency of
democratic governments
S. Grimmelikhuijsen
The Do It
Yourself State
A. Meijer
Section three: the future implications
for our e-government reseach and practice.
Where the contributions so far have looked at the concept of eGovernment itself and the developments in the future, now the shift is made to the future of the study and research of this phenomenon. How can we raise the explanatory power of eGovernment studies in the future? In what way can we benefit from the body of knowledge in different scientific areas (Bekkers)? And how useful is the use of 'a big question' approach for the further development of eGovernment studies (Yildiz)? And what are major trends regarding the development of e-government (Scholl).
Big
questions of e-government research
M. Yildiz |
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)